
Promocamisetas
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Sectors Health Care
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 18
Company Description
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system company that establishes open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and works as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 model supplies actions comparable to other contemporary big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to restrict the capability of these two nations to develop advanced AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first complimentary chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share cost to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more established rivals has been referred to as “upending AI”, [8] making up “the very first shot at what is emerging as a worldwide AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a brand-new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, models, and training information open-source, enabling its code to be easily offered for use, adjustment, viewing, and creating documents for building functions. [13] The company reportedly vigorously recruits young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and employs from outside the computer system science field to diversify its designs’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading because the 2007-2008 financial crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, meaning its code is easily offered for use, modification, and viewing. This consists of approval to access and utilize the source code, as well as style documents, for building functions. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had actually built up a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip constraints on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic general intelligence lab dedicated to research establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s monetary business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital companies were unwilling in supplying financing as it was not likely that it would be able to create an exit in a short time period. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong performance for a low cost, DeepSeek ended up being called the driver for China’s AI model rate war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI“, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the rate of their AI designs to take on the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it was profitable compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed strategies for commercialization; [20] this also enables its innovation to prevent the most stringent provisions of China’s AI policies, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to comply with the federal government’s controls on information. [3]
DeepSeek’s employing preferences target technical capabilities rather than work experience, resulting in many new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI professions are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires people without any computer technology background to assist its technology comprehend other topics and knowledge locations, consisting of being able to create poetry and perform well on the infamously tough Chinese college admissions tests (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available free of charge to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) relating to “open and accountable downstream use” for the model itself. [21]
They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series includes 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline information. This produced the Instruct models.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat types (no Instruct was released). It was established to compete with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper declared benchmark results greater than most open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]
The architecture was essentially the exact same as those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text gotten by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat variations of the two Base models was also launched simultaneously, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed comparable efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are constantly queried, and “routed professionals” that might not be. They discovered this to assist with expert balancing. In basic MoE, some professionals can end up being extremely counted on, while other specialists might be hardly ever used, wasting specifications. Attempting to stabilize the professionals so that they are similarly utilized then triggers specialists to reproduce the very same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to discover core capacities that are frequently utilized, and let the routed experts to discover the peripheral capabilities that are seldom utilized. [28]
In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated detailed services. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The reward model was a process reward model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This benefit design was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit model was constantly upgraded throughout training to prevent benefit hacking. This led to the RL design.
V2
In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two larger designs were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two stages. The first stage was trained to resolve math and coding problems. This phase used 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second stage was trained to be valuable, safe, and follow rules. This stage utilized 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety reward designs were trained on human choice information. The rule-based reward design was manually configured. All experienced reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They went with 2-staged RL, because they discovered that RL on reasoning data had “special attributes” various from RL on general information. For example, RL on reasoning could improve over more training actions. [31]
The two V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and skilled likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “more research study and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 designs were significantly modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of professionals (MoE) alternative previously released in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction information, then combined with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math issues was calculated by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was produced by a reward model trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the unit tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of math and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (math, programming, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, basic concern answering) data. Reasoning data was generated by “expert models”. Non-reasoning information was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by human beings. – The “skilled designs” were trained by beginning with an undefined base design, then SFT on both information, and artificial data created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to show and validate throughout thinking. Then the specialist models were RL utilizing an unspecified reward .
– Each expert design was trained to create just artificial reasoning information in one particular domain (math, programming, reasoning).
– Expert designs were utilized, instead of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad formatting, and extreme length”.
4. Model-based reward designs were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice data including both last reward and chain-of-thought leading to the final reward. The reward model produced benefit signals for both concerns with objective but free-form responses, and questions without unbiased answers (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both benefit models and rule-based reward. The rule-based benefit was computed for mathematics problems with a final response (put in a box), and for programming issues by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek group performed comprehensive low-level engineering to attain effectiveness. They used mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, requiring special GEMM routines to collect accurately. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the communication latency by overlapping extensively calculation and communication, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They lowered communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise device each expert was on in order to prevent specific machines being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]
After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outperformed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became accessible by means of DeepSeek’s API, in addition to via a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond performance of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a solution much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic information generated by R1. [47]
A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant solves it. The assistant initially considers the reasoning process in the mind and after that supplies the user with the answer. The reasoning procedure and response are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here answer here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “generally” of 2 types (other types were not defined): precision benefits and format rewards. Accuracy reward was inspecting whether a boxed answer is correct (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format benefit was inspecting whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has problems with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to attend to these problems and additional improve reasoning: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL procedure as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning information from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated reasoning had an incorrect last response, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for thinking jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K information manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar method as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and reactions
DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently responds to concerns, resolves logic problems and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI business. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 uses considerably less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require just about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested developing its newest AI technology. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at reasonably minimal cost has been recognized as possibly challenging the global supremacy of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was supposedly “on par with” one of OpenAI’s most current models when utilized for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley endeavor capitalist Marc Andreessen likewise described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]
DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly applauded DeepSeek as a national possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with specialists and asked him to supply viewpoints and suggestions on a draft for comments of the yearly 2024 federal government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, which include export restrictions on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI designs as a result “triggered market turmoil” [57] and triggered shares in major global technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 design, had led to record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had mixed reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are included in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “incredibly impressive”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed apprehension of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the design in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its new user registration to phone numbers from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interfered with the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have actually observed that the official application programming user interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers located in China, uses censorship systems for subjects that are thought about politically delicate for the federal government of China. For example, the model refuses to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially generate an answer, but then erases it soon later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship systems and constraints can only be gotten rid of to a limited degree in the open-source version of the R1 design. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and specified: “We firmly oppose any type of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are committed to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through serene ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists were able to deceive DeepSeek into offering certain responses to a few of these subjects by asking for in its answer to switch particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and privacy
Some specialists fear that the government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, monitoring and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy conditions say “We keep the information we gather in safe and secure servers found in individuals’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you supply to our model and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy is constant with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In reaction, the Italian data security authority is seeking additional info on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal data, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually begun a national security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government prohibited using DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s use of individual info. [83]
Artificial intelligence market in China.
Notes
^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required picking “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user could utilize it only 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s low-cost, open AI design DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive designs and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI facilities costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to drop?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model overcame US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design outperforms Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outshines Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design appears to be among the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: letting loose supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek presents an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI model development highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely excellent”: “We must take the developments out of China extremely, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘impressive'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily restricted new sign-ups, pointing out ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t care about totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We tried DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of turmoil”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI presents powerful cyber, data personal privacy threats”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator seeks information from DeepSeek on data defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines result of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, authorities says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.